<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: de Blij v. Parker, Part I: The Cores of Europe and The World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/01/16/de-blij-v-parker-part-i-the-cores-of-europe-and-the-world.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/01/16/de-blij-v-parker-part-i-the-cores-of-europe-and-the-world.html</link>
	<description>High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catholicgauze</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/01/16/de-blij-v-parker-part-i-the-cores-of-europe-and-the-world.html/comment-page-1#comment-7646</link>
		<dc:creator>Catholicgauze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/01/16/de-blij-v-parker-part-i-the-cores-of-europe-and-the-world.html#comment-7646</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Its offical.  TDAXP jumps the shark with sensationalism&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its offical.  TDAXP jumps the shark with sensationalism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark safranski</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/01/16/de-blij-v-parker-part-i-the-cores-of-europe-and-the-world.html/comment-page-1#comment-7647</link>
		<dc:creator>mark safranski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/01/16/de-blij-v-parker-part-i-the-cores-of-europe-and-the-world.html#comment-7647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;de Blij&#039;s core is geoeconomic while Parker&#039;s is spatial-ethnographic. de Blij wins as the geographer of the power-calculus.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Parker&#039;s _Military revolution_ ( which I have yet to read) is well-regarded BTW&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>de Blij&#8217;s core is geoeconomic while Parker&#8217;s is spatial-ethnographic. de Blij wins as the geographer of the power-calculus.</p>
<p> Parker&#8217;s _Military revolution_ ( which I have yet to read) is well-regarded BTW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

