Note: This is a selection from Variations of the OODA Loop, part of tdaxp‘s SummerBlog ’06
Recognizing the validity of the Boydian OODA Loop, several authors have moved beyond it. At the simplest level, this may be for ease of modeling â€“ for instance, combining Orientation and Decision in a calculation implementation operation.45 Likewise, De Vin et al have taken the naive Boydian loop, renamed â€œOrientationâ€ to â€œInterpretation,â€ and declared the loop a model of â€œinformation fusion.â€46 This fusion approach is expanded by the â€œOmnibus Model,â€ which describes itself as an â€œextension of the OODA control loopâ€ and adds â€œfusionâ€ steps after each of the four naive OODA processes, and discusses the four naive stages in more detail.47
The next degree of complication are those authors who incorporate the OODA loop into something grander. For instance, tdaxp has argued that the OODA Loop and the Boyd’s PISRR stages of victory together form a social cognition loop.48 Developed independently of the OODA-PISRR loop and its waveform implications,49 â€œTactical Battle Rhythmâ€ subsumes the OODA loop as just one axis of freedom in a multidimensional wave.50
More radical modifications seek to change the OODA loop itself. Again, not all variations are equally revolutionary. The Iterative OODA Loop is merely a naive OODA loop that allows feedback between orientation and observation51 â€“ it can be viewed as a compromise between the naive and sophisticated Boydian loops. This and other variants are described by Rousseau and Breton in their paper on the Module OODA loop,52 which focuses on sub-processes and
is a modification of the classical OODA loop. The modular architecture refers to the organisation [sic] of a set of modules to model the OODA loop. In the M-OODA loop, the specific modules are defined by the four high-level processes of the OODA loop.
The authors of Module OODA later revised their work.53 This new version, the Cognitive OODA loop, accepts MOODA’s basic assumptions while attempting to reduce distortions that may have entered the model. Another alternate model, along with another admirable literature review, accompanies a description of a â€œDynamic OODA Loop,â€54 which its eight steps of gathering, finding, assessing, laying, deciding, planning, writing, and monitoring.
The ECOM loop, which beings with â€œevents/feedbackâ€ and concludes with â€œproduces,â€ is a radical reinterpretation that â€œhas its rootsâ€ in the naÃ¯ve OODA loop.55
Other variations have sought to improve the practical interpretation of the OODA loop, typically taking the naÃ¯ve loop as a starting point. Bryant devised the CECA (Crique-Explore -Compare-Adapt) loop56 to be more precise for military needs and emphasize pro-active behavior. Another naÃ¯ve-derived loop, Collation, Processing, Analysis, and Distribution, has a similar origin.57 Similarly, Boehm and Turner believe a spiral interpretation would increase agility,58 while Ehresman and Frantzen wish to integrate the naÃ¯ve OODA into the U.S. Navy’s maneuver board process.59
Variations of the OODA Loop, a tdaxp series:
Variations of the OODA Loop 1: Introduction
Variations of the OODA Loop 2: The Naive Boydian Loop
Variations of the OODA Loop 3: The Sophisticated Boydian Loop
Variations of the OODA Loop 4: Pseudo-Boydian Loops
Variations of the OODA Loop 5: Post-Boydian Loops
Variations of the OODA Loop 6: Bibliography