<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Hypothesis for &quot;System Administration for Phenotypes&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/09/02/a-hypothesis-for-system-administration-for-phenotypes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/09/02/a-hypothesis-for-system-administration-for-phenotypes.html</link>
	<description>High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/09/02/a-hypothesis-for-system-administration-for-phenotypes.html/comment-page-1#comment-8620</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/09/02/a-hypothesis-for-system-administration-for-phenotypes.html#comment-8620</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;SSSM is an interesting beast --- it is too vague to generate interesting hypotheses by itself (for that you need something more specific, like Rational Choice model, behaviorism, etc) but specific enough to prevent analysis of genetic factors (we all remember Larry Summers being fired as President of Harvard for suggesting research questions into the broadest genetic categories imaginable).&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; It is an interesting battle, with genetic factors searchers fighting as two movements (behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology) to make these two changes (broaden acceptable inquiry and narrow it down to a useful line of research).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SSSM is an interesting beast &#8212; it is too vague to generate interesting hypotheses by itself (for that you need something more specific, like Rational Choice model, behaviorism, etc) but specific enough to prevent analysis of genetic factors (we all remember Larry Summers being fired as President of Harvard for suggesting research questions into the broadest genetic categories imaginable).</p>
<p> It is an interesting battle, with genetic factors searchers fighting as two movements (behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology) to make these two changes (broaden acceptable inquiry and narrow it down to a useful line of research).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark safranski</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/09/02/a-hypothesis-for-system-administration-for-phenotypes.html/comment-page-1#comment-8619</link>
		<dc:creator>mark safranski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2006/09/02/a-hypothesis-for-system-administration-for-phenotypes.html#comment-8619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;The Standard Social Sciences Model &quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Is simply a model -and a useful one - but when it becomes a mold that new disciplinary discoveries must fit or be discarded, then we need to think about entertaining alternative or complementary models.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Standard Social Sciences Model &#8220;</p>
<p> Is simply a model -and a useful one &#8211; but when it becomes a mold that new disciplinary discoveries must fit or be discarded, then we need to think about entertaining alternative or complementary models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

