<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politically correct. Yes.  Realistic?  No</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/04/09/politically-correct-yes-realistic-no.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/04/09/politically-correct-yes-realistic-no.html</link>
	<description>All of us against the machine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By:  ry </title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/04/09/politically-correct-yes-realistic-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-16312</link>
		<dc:creator> ry </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/04/09/politically-correct-yes-realistic-no.html#comment-16312</guid>
		<description> &lt;p&gt;This reading of the report sounds a lot like JRobb.  I wonder what he makes of it.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reading of the report sounds a lot like JRobb.  I wonder what he makes of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan tdaxp </title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/04/09/politically-correct-yes-realistic-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-16313</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan tdaxp </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/04/09/politically-correct-yes-realistic-no.html#comment-16313</guid>
		<description> &lt;p&gt;ry -- Good catch on the Robbite tone!  The idea of a revolutionary petite bourgeoisie is bizarre in Marxist theory unless one is opposing an agrarian oligopoly, but fits well with the idea of decentralized balance-of-power realism that Robb holds too. [1]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I don&#039;t check up on Robb much (the combination of gloom and balance-of-power-realism makes him generally predictable, but please comment if he addresses the issue!&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; [1] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/02/05/working-definition-of-global-guerrillas-try-2.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/02/05/working-definition-of-global-guerrillas-try-2.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ry &#8212; Good catch on the Robbite tone!  The idea of a revolutionary petite bourgeoisie is bizarre in Marxist theory unless one is opposing an agrarian oligopoly, but fits well with the idea of decentralized balance-of-power realism that Robb holds too. [1]</p>
<p> I don&#39;t check up on Robb much (the combination of gloom and balance-of-power-realism makes him generally predictable, but please comment if he addresses the issue!</p>
<p> [1] <a href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/02/05/working-definition-of-global-guerrillas-try-2.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/02/05/working-definition-of-global-guerrillas-try-2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Dexter Trask </title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/04/09/politically-correct-yes-realistic-no.html/comment-page-1#comment-16314</link>
		<dc:creator> Dexter Trask </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/04/09/politically-correct-yes-realistic-no.html#comment-16314</guid>
		<description> &lt;p&gt;Hmm, the Guardian&#039;s editors have been asleep at the wheel again: &quot;The global population is likely to grow to 8.5bn in 2035, with less developed countries accounting for 98% of that.&quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; After my initial double-take, I was sure that the author did not mean that the population of more-developed countries would be only be 170 million (the US could have well over 400 million people by then, for example). Even if Mr. Norton-Taylor meant &quot;with less-developed countries accounting for 98% of that growth,&quot; it&#039;s still an a muddy sentence.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, the Guardian&#39;s editors have been asleep at the wheel again: &#8220;The global population is likely to grow to 8.5bn in 2035, with less developed countries accounting for 98% of that.&#8221;</p>
<p> After my initial double-take, I was sure that the author did not mean that the population of more-developed countries would be only be 170 million (the US could have well over 400 million people by then, for example). Even if Mr. Norton-Taylor meant &#8220;with less-developed countries accounting for 98% of that growth,&#8221; it&#39;s still an a muddy sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->