<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond the Gates of Bizarro Land</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/15/beyond-the-gates-of-bizarro-land.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/15/beyond-the-gates-of-bizarro-land.html</link>
	<description>All of us against the machine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Riley </title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/15/beyond-the-gates-of-bizarro-land.html/comment-page-1#comment-18270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Riley </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/15/beyond-the-gates-of-bizarro-land.html#comment-18270</guid>
		<description> &lt;p&gt;On the issue of planting software to crash websites, we have seen this kind of activity from invention promoters in the past.  So reasonable people might wonder if birds of a feather flock together.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; This is a SLAPP threat and we have mobilized our organization to slap these dim wads (that&#039;s an OPINION) down.  In my opinion Dozier Internet Law&#039;s actions are severely damaging their client&#039;s interests.  Just how much damage will become apparent over the next few days.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I believe that the only reason that Dozier Internet Law&#039;s business model of getting what is most likely legitimate criticism of Dozier&#039;s clients removed from the web worked is that no one fought back.  Well those days are over, because members of the commercially successful inventor community are by nature not prone to take crap from anyone.  Dozier made a huge error of judgment and now that the firm has drawn our attention we will be providing a support group for past and future Dozier targets.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; In my OPINION companies who were thinking of hiring Dozier Internet Law should rethink their strategy.  There is only one tried and true way for a business to prosper, and that is to treat EVERY customer like they may be your last.  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Trying to gag a customer is going to make them hate you so much that they will be destroying your business by stealth until the day they die.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I think Dozier&#039;s approach is the wrong approach.  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Ronald J. Riley, &lt;br /&gt; President - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.PIAUSA.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.PIAUSA.org&lt;/a&gt; - RJR at PIAUSA.org&lt;br /&gt; Executive Director - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.InventorEd.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.InventorEd.org&lt;/a&gt; - RJR at InvEd.org&lt;br /&gt; Senior Fellow - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.PatentPolicy.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.PatentPolicy.org&lt;/a&gt; - RRiley at PatentPolicy.org&lt;br /&gt; Washington, DC&lt;br /&gt; Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the issue of planting software to crash websites, we have seen this kind of activity from invention promoters in the past.  So reasonable people might wonder if birds of a feather flock together.</p>
<p> This is a SLAPP threat and we have mobilized our organization to slap these dim wads (that&#39;s an OPINION) down.  In my opinion Dozier Internet Law&#39;s actions are severely damaging their client&#39;s interests.  Just how much damage will become apparent over the next few days.</p>
<p> I believe that the only reason that Dozier Internet Law&#39;s business model of getting what is most likely legitimate criticism of Dozier&#39;s clients removed from the web worked is that no one fought back.  Well those days are over, because members of the commercially successful inventor community are by nature not prone to take crap from anyone.  Dozier made a huge error of judgment and now that the firm has drawn our attention we will be providing a support group for past and future Dozier targets.</p>
<p> In my OPINION companies who were thinking of hiring Dozier Internet Law should rethink their strategy.  There is only one tried and true way for a business to prosper, and that is to treat EVERY customer like they may be your last.  </p>
<p> Trying to gag a customer is going to make them hate you so much that they will be destroying your business by stealth until the day they die.</p>
<p> I think Dozier&#39;s approach is the wrong approach.  </p>
<p> Ronald J. Riley, <br /> President &#8211; <a href="http://www.PIAUSA.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.PIAUSA.org</a> &#8211; RJR at PIAUSA.org<br /> Executive Director &#8211; <a href="http://www.InventorEd.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.InventorEd.org</a> &#8211; RJR at InvEd.org<br /> Senior Fellow &#8211; <a href="http://www.PatentPolicy.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.PatentPolicy.org</a> &#8211; RRiley at PatentPolicy.org<br /> Washington, DC<br /> Direct (202) 318-1595 &#8211; 9 am to 9 pm EST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan tdaxp </title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/15/beyond-the-gates-of-bizarro-land.html/comment-page-1#comment-18271</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan tdaxp </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/15/beyond-the-gates-of-bizarro-land.html#comment-18271</guid>
		<description> &lt;p&gt;Also disturbing is that, by John Dozier&#039;s own standards, these cease-and-desist letters aren&#039;t even serious!&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/16/is-dozier-internet-law-serious-john-dozier-doesn-t-seem-to-t.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/16/is-dozier-internet-law-serious-john-dozier-doesn-t-seem-to-t.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also disturbing is that, by John Dozier&#39;s own standards, these cease-and-desist letters aren&#39;t even serious!</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/16/is-dozier-internet-law-serious-john-dozier-doesn-t-seem-to-t.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/16/is-dozier-internet-law-serious-john-dozier-doesn-t-seem-to-t.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->