Comments on: "Scofflaw Bloggers:" The Dozier Taxonomy of Wicked Netizens

By: Brendan

Brendan — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

That would be consistent with the SOP that we've come to know from John Dozier... name calling and deception rather than answering with facts and well reasoned answers.

If your theory is correct... does that mean that when you are asleep... you are a wacko on his backo?

By: Dan tdaxp

Dan tdaxp — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Indeed!

PS: Congrats on making 16, 17, and (indirectly) 23!

http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/24/2007-dozier-internet-law-google-rankings-week-2.html

By: fl

fl — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

I'm teaching logical fallacies in one of my composition classes next week, and now have some great material to use to explain what "ad hominem" means. I especially like the suggestion that certain bloggers who post attacks or criticisms are "druggies."

It's amazing how these guys don't just lack an understanding of how copyright works on the Internet -- they lack an understanding of how copyright works in general.

And forbidding people to view your HTML source code is like building a house and forbidding visitors to view the bricks: bricks which were, of course, created by someone else ...

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

"I guess the test will be if tdaxp folds up shop once someone calls me a nerd."

Hmm. You are a nerd, you are a nerd, you are a nerd. . .

Blog's still here. And you're actually married, so talking to girls isn't a problem. Guess you aren't a nerd-- a geek, maybe, but not a nerd.

By: Dan tdaxp

Dan tdaxp — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

fl,

Agreed. Dozier's actions are bizarre.

Michael,

You're right. I've now been called a nerd, and I have no desire to stop blogging. Oh well...