<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The urchinTracker() method: How Dozier Internet Law, PC&#8217;s website secretly spies on its visitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/28/the-urchintracker-method-how-dozier-internet-law-pcs-website-secretly-spies-on-its-visitors.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/28/the-urchintracker-method-how-dozier-internet-law-pcs-website-secretly-spies-on-its-visitors.html</link>
	<description>High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrategyUnit </title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/28/the-urchintracker-method-how-dozier-internet-law-pcs-website-secretly-spies-on-its-visitors.html/comment-page-1#comment-18382</link>
		<dc:creator>StrategyUnit </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/28/the-urchintracker-method-how-dozier-internet-law-pcs-website-secretly-spies-on-its-visitors.html#comment-18382</guid>
		<description> &lt;p&gt;To their credit, they do state that visitors are being tracked on the Privacy Page. I&#039;m really puzzled if they are taking seriously as Internet law experts.&lt;/p&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To their credit, they do state that visitors are being tracked on the Privacy Page. I&#39;m really puzzled if they are taking seriously as Internet law experts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan tdaxp </title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/28/the-urchintracker-method-how-dozier-internet-law-pcs-website-secretly-spies-on-its-visitors.html/comment-page-1#comment-18383</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan tdaxp </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/10/28/the-urchintracker-method-how-dozier-internet-law-pcs-website-secretly-spies-on-its-visitors.html#comment-18383</guid>
		<description> &lt;p&gt;Excellent catch!&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I wonder what is the process for refusing the user agreement, and un-tracking yourself on the index and user agreement pages?&quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Also from the agreement:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &quot;We don’t presently conduct e-commerce activities in the sense of accepting registrations or providing private access to a protected area of our website.&quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Which means, I assume that the protected area of their website, available by clicking on &quot;Administration (authorization required)&quot; [1], is unavailable for any non-Dozier-employee.  Which makes it all the stranger there would be a link to it.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Unless&lt;br /&gt; (a) the user agreement is in error&lt;br /&gt; (b) Dozier has no security sense whatsoever&lt;br /&gt; (c) the link is a honey-pot designed to track hackers&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Hmm...&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; [1] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cybertriallawyer.com/user-agreement&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cybertriallawyer.com/user-agreement&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent catch!</p>
<p> I wonder what is the process for refusing the user agreement, and un-tracking yourself on the index and user agreement pages?&#8221;</p>
<p> Also from the agreement:</p>
<p> &#8220;We don’t presently conduct e-commerce activities in the sense of accepting registrations or providing private access to a protected area of our website.&#8221;</p>
<p> Which means, I assume that the protected area of their website, available by clicking on &#8220;Administration (authorization required)&#8221; [1], is unavailable for any non-Dozier-employee.  Which makes it all the stranger there would be a link to it.</p>
<p> Unless<br /> (a) the user agreement is in error<br /> (b) Dozier has no security sense whatsoever<br /> (c) the link is a honey-pot designed to track hackers</p>
<p> Hmm&#8230;</p>
<p> [1] <a href="http://www.cybertriallawyer.com/user-agreement" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybertriallawyer.com/user-agreement</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

