Comments on: Howard Gardner and the Theory of Multiple Intelligences http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/12/29/howard-gardner-and-the-theory-of-multiple-intelligences.html High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:18:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: David Hallowell http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/12/29/howard-gardner-and-the-theory-of-multiple-intelligences.html/comment-page-1#comment-19037 David Hallowell Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/12/29/howard-gardner-and-the-theory-of-multiple-intelligences.html#comment-19037 <p>Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! This is the post I've been meaning to write for some time. I agree with everything you've noted. And this is exactly why I've mentioned before that MI should not be referred to as a theory.</p> Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! This is the post I've been meaning to write for some time. I agree with everything you've noted. And this is exactly why I've mentioned before that MI should not be referred to as a theory.

]]> By: Dan McIntosh http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/12/29/howard-gardner-and-the-theory-of-multiple-intelligences.html/comment-page-1#comment-19038 Dan McIntosh Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2007/12/29/howard-gardner-and-the-theory-of-multiple-intelligences.html#comment-19038 <p>Cogently put.<br /> <br /> So long as some respect remains for science, there are political reasons to cloak an ideology in the language of science.</p> Cogently put.

So long as some respect remains for science, there are political reasons to cloak an ideology in the language of science.

]]>