Tom has compared Vladimir Putin to the founder of Singapore, but a closer analog would be Hosni Mubarak: a security-sector insider able to neutralize mainstream opposition, unable to neutralize violent radical opposition, and most notable for slowly destroying his state’s ability to project power.
When I endorsed Barack Obama and John McCain, both were given only about a 30% chance of getting a nomination. That is, there was less than a 10% chance of both of them winning their parties before I endorsed. But tdaxp spoke, and the world changed.
Now McCain and Obama are all-but-inevitable nominees of their party. It’s time to look to the general election. And while the McCain is generally stronger than Obama on the core issues (Iraq, Russia, Immigration, tax policy, etc.), the overwhelming difference is on abortion: Obama supports infanticide; McCain doesn’t.
The objective therefore has to be to weaken Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, to save as many lives as possible.
And of course, her race/sex war rhetoric does little to bring the Democratic Party together. So with this understanding: that Barack Obama is and should be the Democratic nominee, but must not be President, I hereby request that you
If Hillary can pull of a good showing in Ohio and Texas, she can extend the Democratic primaries to Pennsylvania. If she can do well there, she can fight for the party’s nomination. Either Obama wins far weaker than he would have, or Clinton wins so discredited that the harm she does to the Democratic Party outweighs the miniscule chance that she can defeat Obama.
Clinton: Because the infanticidaires deserve the very worst.
Taxes and Budget… very similar Iraq and Foreign Policy… very similar Trade and Economics… very similar Immigration… very similar Health Care… similar Abortion and Birth Control… similar Medical Marijuna and Drug Policy… very different