<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: At Least Willie Horton Didn&#8217;t Question Why You Confess Your Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/14/at-least-willie-horton-didnt-question-why-you-confess-your-religion.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/14/at-least-willie-horton-didnt-question-why-you-confess-your-religion.html</link>
	<description>High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark in Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/14/at-least-willie-horton-didnt-question-why-you-confess-your-religion.html/comment-page-1#comment-58812</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5487#comment-58812</guid>
		<description>I am starting to believe that there is some part of the Harvard core curriculum that includes a mandatory class in Marxist analysis and contempt for Middle American values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am starting to believe that there is some part of the Harvard core curriculum that includes a mandatory class in Marxist analysis and contempt for Middle American values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/14/at-least-willie-horton-didnt-question-why-you-confess-your-religion.html/comment-page-1#comment-56319</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5487#comment-56319</guid>
		<description>Agreed that the &quot;bitterness&quot; word wasn&#039;t a big deal.  It was a faux paus. 

It was the second half of the comment that was more disturbing to some people [1], and his explanation that made it worse [2].

[1] http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/12/is-obama-insensitive-to-uneducated-whites.html
[2] http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/13/the-cnn-compassion-forum.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that the &#8220;bitterness&#8221; word wasn&#8217;t a big deal.  It was a faux paus. </p>
<p>It was the second half of the comment that was more disturbing to some people [1], and his explanation that made it worse [2].</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/12/is-obama-insensitive-to-uneducated-whites.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/12/is-obama-insensitive-to-uneducated-whites.html</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/13/the-cnn-compassion-forum.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/13/the-cnn-compassion-forum.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biz</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/04/14/at-least-willie-horton-didnt-question-why-you-confess-your-religion.html/comment-page-1#comment-55954</link>
		<dc:creator>biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5487#comment-55954</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s just him.
I mean, I&#039;ll admit quite a bit of confusion on this whole bitterness thing.  I get it, I get what he means and I know exactly who he&#039;s talking about.  Why he said it?  Eh.  It was kinda dumb.
But look at McCain on the Sunni vs. Shiite comment.  I think in the general election it will end up McCain&#039;s &quot;Quote Attacks&quot; will be directed at making Obama look inexperienced and out of touch and Obama&#039;s Quote Attacks will be focused on making McCain look old and out of touch.

If put can quote nearly everything a person says to anyone else in a day, they&#039;re going to screw up eventually. 

Could the attacks even themselves out, or will Obama suffer by not taking the negative route?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s just him.<br />
I mean, I&#8217;ll admit quite a bit of confusion on this whole bitterness thing.  I get it, I get what he means and I know exactly who he&#8217;s talking about.  Why he said it?  Eh.  It was kinda dumb.<br />
But look at McCain on the Sunni vs. Shiite comment.  I think in the general election it will end up McCain&#8217;s &#8220;Quote Attacks&#8221; will be directed at making Obama look inexperienced and out of touch and Obama&#8217;s Quote Attacks will be focused on making McCain look old and out of touch.</p>
<p>If put can quote nearly everything a person says to anyone else in a day, they&#8217;re going to screw up eventually. </p>
<p>Could the attacks even themselves out, or will Obama suffer by not taking the negative route?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

