<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Requests Japanese Military Insistance: Backwardness on both sides nixes the deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/05/30/china-requests-japanese-military-insistance-backwardness-on-both-sides-nixes-the-deal.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/05/30/china-requests-japanese-military-insistance-backwardness-on-both-sides-nixes-the-deal.html</link>
	<description>High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdaxp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Japanese Military in China</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/05/30/china-requests-japanese-military-insistance-backwardness-on-both-sides-nixes-the-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-91572</link>
		<dc:creator>tdaxp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Japanese Military in China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5604#comment-91572</guid>
		<description>[...] won&#8217;t make the splash that Sichuan Earthquake Relief would have (until both governments scuttled the idea), but the Japanese Maritime Self Defense [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] won&#8217;t make the splash that Sichuan Earthquake Relief would have (until both governments scuttled the idea), but the Japanese Maritime Self Defense [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElamBend</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/05/30/china-requests-japanese-military-insistance-backwardness-on-both-sides-nixes-the-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-79534</link>
		<dc:creator>ElamBend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5604#comment-79534</guid>
		<description>I was disappointed that the deal fell through, but I take that same hope from it that you do; the original request seemed shocking, through it shouldn&#039;t.  The second won&#039;t seem as shocking.  It was a bold move by the Chinese leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was disappointed that the deal fell through, but I take that same hope from it that you do; the original request seemed shocking, through it shouldn&#8217;t.  The second won&#8217;t seem as shocking.  It was a bold move by the Chinese leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

