<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama as the Worst Shot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/06/04/obama-as-the-worst-shot.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/06/04/obama-as-the-worst-shot.html</link>
	<description>High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay@Soob</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/06/04/obama-as-the-worst-shot.html/comment-page-1#comment-81519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay@Soob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5616#comment-81519</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obama will make both Sunrises and Sunsets prettier.&quot;
Lol! 

&quot;“that Barack Obama does better in caucuses than in elections where the old and the working can vote (likely), or both (also likely).”

I take this to mean that both old and working class voters are more involved with the general election than they are the primary&#039;s? Is this deduction accurate?

Jeffrey there&#039;s a very clear Obama demographic and it is people under the age of 30 (some accounts put 60% of them behind Obama.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama will make both Sunrises and Sunsets prettier.&#8221;<br />
Lol! </p>
<p>&#8220;“that Barack Obama does better in caucuses than in elections where the old and the working can vote (likely), or both (also likely).”</p>
<p>I take this to mean that both old and working class voters are more involved with the general election than they are the primary&#8217;s? Is this deduction accurate?</p>
<p>Jeffrey there&#8217;s a very clear Obama demographic and it is people under the age of 30 (some accounts put 60% of them behind Obama.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/06/04/obama-as-the-worst-shot.html/comment-page-1#comment-81501</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5616#comment-81501</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey,

Interesting point on cross-party voters.

Clearly there&#039;s been attempts by conservative voters to support Hillary Clinton.    Likewise, Obama has refused to condemn black liberation theology while (in the past, at least) actively courting communists [1].  From this, is it reasonable to conclude that Clinton is a more moderate figure than Obama?

Regarding Obamapacifists: [2].  Still, I assume these folks are as deluded as the Obamanicans.

[1] http://www.redstate.com/stories/elections/2008/barack_obama_sought_the_new_partys_endorsement_knowing_it_was_a_radical_left_organization
[2] http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/01/03/vote-mccain-vote-obama.html#comment-77723</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey,</p>
<p>Interesting point on cross-party voters.</p>
<p>Clearly there&#8217;s been attempts by conservative voters to support Hillary Clinton.    Likewise, Obama has refused to condemn black liberation theology while (in the past, at least) actively courting communists [1].  From this, is it reasonable to conclude that Clinton is a more moderate figure than Obama?</p>
<p>Regarding Obamapacifists: [2].  Still, I assume these folks are as deluded as the Obamanicans.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://www.redstate.com/stories/elections/2008/barack_obama_sought_the_new_partys_endorsement_knowing_it_was_a_radical_left_organization" rel="nofollow">http://www.redstate.com/stories/elections/2008/barack_obama_sought_the_new_partys_endorsement_knowing_it_was_a_radical_left_organization</a><br />
[2] <a href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/01/03/vote-mccain-vote-obama.html#comment-77723" rel="nofollow">http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/01/03/vote-mccain-vote-obama.html#comment-77723</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleslog</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/06/04/obama-as-the-worst-shot.html/comment-page-1#comment-81471</link>
		<dc:creator>purpleslog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5616#comment-81471</guid>
		<description>I think these are some others:

Obama will cool the earth.

An Obama administration will be for good schools.

Obama will make both Sunrises and Sunsets prettier.

Obama will make hippies smell less.

Obama through the eloquence of his rhetoric will convince anti-US terrorist to take up ceramics and perhaps hacky-sack instead of terrorism related activity.

Obama&#039;s health care plan will increase lifespans and decrease headache frequency. Plus it will be paid for by greedy corporations and fat cats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these are some others:</p>
<p>Obama will cool the earth.</p>
<p>An Obama administration will be for good schools.</p>
<p>Obama will make both Sunrises and Sunsets prettier.</p>
<p>Obama will make hippies smell less.</p>
<p>Obama through the eloquence of his rhetoric will convince anti-US terrorist to take up ceramics and perhaps hacky-sack instead of terrorism related activity.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s health care plan will increase lifespans and decrease headache frequency. Plus it will be paid for by greedy corporations and fat cats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey James</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/06/04/obama-as-the-worst-shot.html/comment-page-1#comment-81383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5616#comment-81383</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obama doesn’t believe in war as a tool of policy&quot;

I don&#039;t recall supporters ever assuming he is a pure pacifist, but keep up the the transparent straw man talk as it could lead towards sympathy for Obama.

&quot;Obama will invade Pakistan&quot;  

I could take this opportunity to lambaste McCain and say, &quot;McCan&#039;s a apeassser of Wizarersten yeaaaa haw,&quot; but I can agree that all courses of military action should be scrutinized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama doesn’t believe in war as a tool of policy&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall supporters ever assuming he is a pure pacifist, but keep up the the transparent straw man talk as it could lead towards sympathy for Obama.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama will invade Pakistan&#8221;  </p>
<p>I could take this opportunity to lambaste McCain and say, &#8220;McCan&#8217;s a apeassser of Wizarersten yeaaaa haw,&#8221; but I can agree that all courses of military action should be scrutinized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey James</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/06/04/obama-as-the-worst-shot.html/comment-page-1#comment-81378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5616#comment-81378</guid>
		<description>&quot;while Clinton wins a pluraity of Democratic votes.&quot;

And you could have anti-Hillary, obstructionist Republican activist to thank for that.  Before you go and say, &quot;Well, Democratic activist do that as well blah blah blah,&quot; I will let you know I fully acknowledge that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;while Clinton wins a pluraity of Democratic votes.&#8221;</p>
<p>And you could have anti-Hillary, obstructionist Republican activist to thank for that.  Before you go and say, &#8220;Well, Democratic activist do that as well blah blah blah,&#8221; I will let you know I fully acknowledge that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey James</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/06/04/obama-as-the-worst-shot.html/comment-page-1#comment-81374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5616#comment-81374</guid>
		<description>&quot;that Barack Obama does better in caucuses than in elections where the old and the working can vote (likely), or both (also likely).&quot;

That&#039;s funny, the caucus I went to mostly had people that looked like they were at least 50, and I could probably count those my age on both hands with a turnout of 140-150.  Of course, I am sure that particular caucus defied the odds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that Barack Obama does better in caucuses than in elections where the old and the working can vote (likely), or both (also likely).&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s funny, the caucus I went to mostly had people that looked like they were at least 50, and I could probably count those my age on both hands with a turnout of 140-150.  Of course, I am sure that particular caucus defied the odds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

