Comments on: Barack Obama and the Surge http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/07/17/barack-obama-and-the-surge.html High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:09:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tdaxp » Blog Archive » But does Israel support an Undivided Jerusalem? http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/07/17/barack-obama-and-the-surge.html/comment-page-1#comment-106817 tdaxp » Blog Archive » But does Israel support an Undivided Jerusalem? Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:28:05 +0000 http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5766#comment-106817 [...] another far more serious one, where Obama may or may not support an Undivided Jerusalem. Whatever his ultimate position, he certainly didn’t know what those words meant when he said [...] [...] another far more serious one, where Obama may or may not support an Undivided Jerusalem. Whatever his ultimate position, he certainly didn’t know what those words meant when he said [...]

]]> By: Dan tdaxp http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/07/17/barack-obama-and-the-surge.html/comment-page-1#comment-103831 Dan tdaxp Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:51:44 +0000 http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5766#comment-103831 On the subject of Obama learning on the job, Charles Krauthammer argued that Obama did not flip flop, when he adjusted his position from supporting an "undivided Jerusalem" [1,2,3,4] to supporting presuming Palestinian sovereignty over the Jewish Quarter, and the rest of the Old City... rather, Obama did not know the meaning of the words. Obama literally did not know what he was talking about. [1] http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_reaffirms_his_support_fo.asp [2] http://hedgehogcentral.blogspot.com/2008/07/obama-gives-final-burial-to-undivided.html [3] http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/06/undivided_jerusalem_1.php [4] http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed7/idUSMAC46470920080604 On the subject of Obama learning on the job, Charles Krauthammer argued that Obama did not flip flop, when he adjusted his position from supporting an “undivided Jerusalem” [1,2,3,4] to supporting presuming Palestinian sovereignty over the Jewish Quarter, and the rest of the Old City… rather, Obama did not know the meaning of the words.

Obama literally did not know what he was talking about.

[1] http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_reaffirms_his_support_fo.asp
[2] http://hedgehogcentral.blogspot.com/2008/07/obama-gives-final-burial-to-undivided.html
[3] http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/06/undivided_jerusalem_1.php
[4] http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed7/idUSMAC46470920080604

]]> By: Smitten Eagle http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2008/07/17/barack-obama-and-the-surge.html/comment-page-1#comment-103818 Smitten Eagle Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:48:02 +0000 http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=5766#comment-103818 Obama is an empty suit. He's all about Change. That is, Changing his position. Obama is an empty suit.

He’s all about Change. That is, Changing his position.

]]>