Comments on: Liberals v. Science

By: Dan tdaxp

Dan tdaxp — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:52:07 +0000

Friedman is part of the editorial board (as are Bill Krystol, Bob Herbert, etc), and seperate from the newsreporting bulk of the newspaper.

By: Jeffrey James

Jeffrey James — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:02:38 +0000

All I said was that it depends on who is writing the editorial/article. Last time I checked, Thomas Friedman writes for the NYT, and he seems to somewhat fit your brand of conservatism.

By: Jeffrey James

Jeffrey James — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:34:36 +0000

“As a conservative, I find myself looking at liberal organizations from the outside. I’ve long considered the New York Times to be “mainstream liberal,” though I appreciate the feedback indicating I may have been giving them too much credit.

Thank you.”

By: Dan tdaxp

Dan tdaxp — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:12:17 +0000

Jeffrey,

Thanks for the help.

As a conservative, I find myself looking at liberal organizations from the outside. I’ve long considered the New York Times to be “mainstream liberal,” though I appreciate the feedback indicating I may have been giving them too much credit.

Thank you.

By: Jeffrey James

Jeffrey James — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:04:53 +0000

Depends on who is writing the article/editorial.

By: Dan tdaxp

Dan tdaxp — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:50:34 +0000

Would you consider the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the Chronicle of higher ed to be under the control of “hardcore feminist pseudo-science”?

By: Jeffrey James

Jeffrey James — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:45:28 +0000

Interesting. You have always considered me progressive (I assume you mean “liberal” by that), and you and I have always been in agreement on this subject. I think a better title would be hardcore feminist pseudo-science v. science.