November 2008
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Influential Operations

by tdaxp ~ November 16th, 2008

If you haven’t been reading The Committee of Public Safety, you are missing out. There are too many interesting threads to mention (you can easily browse the archives to read thoughts on Howard Bloom, John Boyd, the financial crisis, and other topics), but for now I’ll simply link to the CSP’s take on the xGW Model of War.

Also now’s a good time to give a shout out to HG’s World, which celebrates one year of blogging this month. Happy anniversary!

7 Responses to Influential Operations

  1. Jay@Soob

    A bit reminiscent of Arherring’s Left of Boom-Right of Boom [1].

    [1] http://www.dreaming5gw.com/2007/10/xgw_left_of_boom_right_of_boom.php

  2. purpleslog

    I will check out the link.

    The Pure Kinetic / Pure Info continuum is interesting. Perhaps it might be a better fir then non-kinetics (dispersed kinetics) / Kinetic continuum.

  3. tdaxp

    The conceptual difference between kinetic/information and kinetic/nonkinetic is that “pure information” is only one form of “pure non-kinetic” / “completely dispersed kinetic” warfare. If this is a useful distinction, there should be some form of struggle that is completely dispersed but completely non-information-based.

  4. purpleslog

    Correct/good point

  5. tdaxp

    What could such a non-kinetic non-information form of warfare be?

    Or is it a question on whether non-kinetic is really just mostly information, but that the term information is more precise?

    Hmm…

  6. purpleslog

    Or is it a question on whether non-kinetic is really just mostly information, but that the term information is more precise

    That is what I was thinking when I first commented.

    It might be a better way to express the concept.

    Let me think. What else is non-kinetic and not-information? Economic or trade warfare? Yeah goods move around…but prices and market fluctuations are really just information.

    Lawfare? All information based.

  7. tdaxp

    The Committee today discusses behavioral economics, which was also mentioned on MSNBC so it must be making the rounds. As I wrote at CPS:

    Be careful of the difference between Skinner’s operant conditioning (reward & capture) and Pavlov’s respondant conditioning. Skinner’s is more recent, still widely used, and more effective.

    Operant conditioning uses punishment rarely, if at all, because punishment simply is not effective. Reward an incompatible behavior, but punishing is worthless. Indeed, in a fully skinnerian worldview, punishment and sadism are pretty much identical.

    [1] http://committeeofpublicsafety.wordpress.com/2008/11/22/an-intimacy-with-pain/

Leave a Reply

tdaxp is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!