My UFO Theory

Perhaps this is where I go off the deep-end, but I have developed a comprehensive theory of UFOs that accounts for Nazi experiments, the Foo Fighters, flying saucers, flying lights, and lost time. I first described this theory in a face-to-face chat with Catholicgauze. I became more convinced after listening to a podcast about the Rendelsham Forest Incident.

Basically, I assume that UFOs are a product of a series of government experiments on ultralight, nonkinetic “shock” weapons. That is, intelligently-guided UFOs (up to the late 1980s) shared several common features

1. they possessed much less mass than other, human-produced flying vehicles
2. they were incapable of physical attacks
3. they were designed to disrupt C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance)

The classic UFO came in several phases. The first phase was the Foo Fighters of World War II. The second phase was the ‘flying saucer’ of the late 1940s and 1950s. The third phase was the lights in the sky, of the 1970s and 1980s. The two gaps in UFOs – the 1960s and 1990s to 2000s — are accounted for by two now widely known (but once experimental) flying technologies: turboshaft helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

PHASE ONE
Common Name: The Foo Fighters
Who was behind it? The Nazis
When did it occur: 1944-1945
Explanation: The collapse of Nazi Germany occured in the face of breathtaking innovations. Some of these concerned mililitary strategy, such as Nazi suicide troops. Others were primarily military, such as an increase in yearly German industrial production notwithstanding heavy Allied bombardment. Some were horribly cruel, such as the Holocaust. Another was the Foo Fighters.

German researchers, searching for ways to turn back allied bombers, decided to research ways of terrifying Allied pilots. The Germans developed ultralight manned craft, perhaps consisting of nothing more than a wing coated with nonreflective paint and a peddle-powered floodlight. On an individual level, the pilots would either turn back (best case, less likely) or drop their munitions in panic with minimal damage (more likely case). On an operational level, Allied High Command may determine that the Germans were on the verge of developing very advanced weaponry which would make the costs of an ‘unconditional surrender’ unacceptable high. Unfortunately for the Nazis, the pilots were jocks who were more curious than afraid, and the U.S. was developing the nuclear bomb (which would make more advanced aircraft irrelevant).

PHASE TWO
Common Name: Flying Saucers
Who was behind it? U.S. Department of Defense
When did it occur: 1947-1959
Explanation: In January 1947 President Harry S Truman rejected the Morganthau Plan and began outlining a Cold War strategy that accounted for the Federal Republic of Germany and Japan as allies of the United States. America was in the middle of a four-year nuclear monopoly, and American scientific prowess (buttressed by German exiles and emigres) was an important advantage. In a classified operation, perhaps partially subsumed by parts of Operational Alsos and Operational Paperclip, German researchers in ultralight non-kinetic flying shock weapons were brought to the United States. Following the apparent failure of the ‘flying lights’ Foo Fighters strategy, the flying vehicles were made to be visible in the daylight. Perhaps taking advantage of earlier U.S. research into Coanda Effect, the flying saucer debuted.

The first published sighting of a flying saucer occurred on June 24, 1947, outside Seattle. The first sighting kept the brightness of the Foo Fighters, though later revisions would lose the light. Another flying saucer crashed on July 8, 1947, in Roswell, New Mexico. The crew was comprised of Japanese Volunteers, chosen for their small stature and low weight, who decided to not come back to Japan in the 1947 repatriations because of the fear of shame of surrendering. (One such self-disappeared Japanese POW, Ishinosuke Uwano, was found in 2006 in Ukraine). The death of the test pilots would have been extraordinarily sensitive (for personal and diplomatic reasons), and was covered up, first with the weather balloon hoax, and later (either in a MIHOP or LIHOP action) with the alien mythos.

In the 1950s, flying saucers investigated as pat of a problem to disrupt C4ISR in nuclear installations. In the event of a nuclear war, even a five minute breakdown in normal base operations could materially impact the post-exchange balance of forces.

INTERIM ONE
Common Name: Turboshaft Helicopters
Who was behind it: Kaman Aircraft / U.S. Department of Defense
When did it occur: 1951 – Present
Explanation: On December 11, 1951, the Kamen K-225 became the first turboshaft helicopter in the world. The Turboshaft Helicopter rendered the Flying Saucer irrelevant, as it opposed greater offensive, defensive, and shock value. While knowledge of what a Flying Saucer actually was would render the ship harmless (no one is scared of balsa wood), knowledge of what a Turboshaft Helicopter was left the fear intact (it is a flying machine designed to kill you). While the emergence of the Alien Mythos saved the Flying Saucer project for a number of years, the greater lethality and economies-of-scale of the Turboshaft Helicopter ended research into ultralight non-kinetic shock weapons. However, the invention of the controlled laser on May 16, 1960, combined with unknown research into Tritium, would lead t a reemergence of the flying lights phenomenon.

PHASE THREE
Common Name: Lights in the Sky
Who was behind it: U.S. Department of Defense
When did it occur: 1951 (first public sighting) – 1970s/1980s (mass sightings).
Explanation:

Three sub-phases of the Lights in the Sky were the Earliest Flights, Intersecting Lasers, and Black Triangles. Two related aspects were Missing Time and Cattle Mutilations.

Research on self-illuminating flying lights in the sky may have began as early as 1951, as demonstrated by the Lubbock sightings: The Lubbock lights “appeared to be about the size of a dinner plate and they were greenish-blue, slightly fluorescent in color. They were smaller than the full moon at the horizon. There were about a dozen to fifteen of these lights…they were absolutely circular…it gave all of us…an extremely eerie feeling.” Unlike the Foo Fighters (which created curiosity) and the Flying Saucers (which inspired awe and the Alien Mythos), the Lights in the Sky succeeding in evoking disquieting emotional reactions. These early lights in the sky continued the ultralight design of the Foo Fighters, though with the addition of radioactive self-illuminating decals.

The invention of the laser allowed the separation of the light source and the position of the light. Unlike the Foo Fighters and the early lights in the sky, systems that incorporated lasers created entirely new possibilities. For instance, in the Rendelsham Forest incident, lights in the sky appeared to fly through objects. That is, the emitted light travelled in an arc at a certain velocity, was not projected during the time that the arc would intersect with a physical object, as was projected once the arc passed the object, making it appear that the light continued through the object. Using an unknown method (perhaps intersecting lasers, whose constructive interference would allow them to pass the threshold of vision in their intersection, but not elsewhere), lights could also appear to soundlessly circle houses, barracks, bunkers, and other sensitive areas. Tests were conducted both on military personnel and on civilian populations, to investigate the breakdown of police, fire, and military communication networks during lights in the sky sightings.

Flying Triangles are comprised of three lights in the sky in a stable formation to form the points of a triangle, with another light in the middle. Light pollution is generated to make it impossible to see the stars behind the triangle forms by the outer three lights, while the presence of the fourth light tricks the observer into imagining seeing the underside of a craft. Unlike the Foo Fighters, the Earliest Lights, or the Intersecting Lasers, Flying Triangles could appear to be massively large. Therefore, even for observers who did not believe the Alien Mythos, Flying Triangles could be perceived as serving as enemy ultraheavy lift capacity.

RELATED PHENOMENA
Common Names: Missing Time, Cattle Mutilations, Conspiracy Theories
Who was behind it: U.S. Department of Defense / others
When Did It Occur: 1970s – now

However, like all such UFOs to that point, Flying Triangles were kinetically harmless. Three aspects to the Lights in the Sky emerged around the 1970s that served to either physically disrupt C4STAR or increase the fear of doing so. These were Missing Time, Cattle Mutilizations, and Conspiracy Theories. These related phenemona do not neatly fit into the timeline of ultralight shock weapons, as they may be ancillary tactics that serve as force multipliers for ultralight shock weapons. Missing Time may be similar to photosensitive epilepsy and the bucha effect, caused by exposure to some patterns of light sources used in the Lights in the Sky. Cattle mutiliations may have been an attempt to study the propagation of information about horrific attacks against inessential personnel. Conspiracy theories, such as MJ-12 (and related ideas of both a Deep State and exopolitics) were created (either through MIHOP or LIHOP) to divert attention from the ultralight shock weapon program, which would have been rendered harmless if people realized they were physically harmless.

INTERIM TWO
Common Name: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles / Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles /
Killer Robots
Who was behind it: U.S. Department of Defense
When did it occur: 1916 (invention of UAV) – 1960s (first armed
drones) – 1970s (Project: HAVE LEMON) – 1991 (Gulf War deployment) –
2001 (Afghanistan public debut) – Present
Explanation: Just as the Turnoshaft Helicopter rendered the Flying Saucer irrelevant, the UCAV rendered the Lights in the Sky irrelevant. UAVs in formation cold duplicate the effects of the Lights (such as Flying Triangles, etc) with greater maneuverability and economies of scale. Further, while knowledge of what Lights in the Sky actually were would render them harmless, knowledge that UCAVs are actually Killer Robots make them more terrifying. For the first time in the history of war, a non-human intelligence that felt no pain, held no honor, experienced no regret, and knew no fear patrolled the skies and rained death down to the earth. While UAVs and UCAVs are typically under remote human control (in additional to nonhuman automatic systems), the human is likely to be in a comfortable air conditioned room and be emotionally detached from the events in battle.

When the Alien Mythos first became attached to the UFO phenomenon, many began believing they could face armed attack from nonhuman enemies. The UCAV makes this belief a reality. As such, the UFO (as an ultralight non-kinetic shock weapon) is an obsolete technology, and will be into the indefinite future.

10 thoughts on “My UFO Theory”

  1. Whoa.

    So this has all been kept secret all these years?

    That is the part that makes me highly dubious. People in societies like ours cannot keep secrets on this scale for a long time.

    In Russia, where getting assassinated is a realistic threat, maybe so.

    Here, not so much.

    How many people do you think would have had knowledge of the reality of these programs? Thousands, hundreds, dozens? The lower the number, the more possible this theory becomes.

  2. “Cattle mutiliations may have been an attempt to study the propagation of information about horrific attacks against inessential personnel.” (tdaxp)

    I wish you’d explain this further. Who exactly are “incessential personnel?”

  3. Hey guys,

    Thanks for the comments.

    I think the secrecy works out. That Americans can’t keep secrts is constantly repeated, but I’m not sure why this would be so. Individuals in the intelligence community do not speak about what they know not because a gun is to their heads, but it would be the wrong thing to do.

    Take the Roswell theory that’s part of this post. Revealing that information would cause real pain to our friends. It would hurt innocent people who rely on us, who trust us, and who have died for us.

    It is far easier, for a secrecy point of view, to release information, misinformation, and disinformation, and compartmentalization than to kill people who talk. Consider Lights in the Sky. Presuming they were developed as part of a white or grey research program (one can see the dull report titles, “A Method for the use of Constructive Luminace Interference for the Projection of Basic Figures in the Visual Spectrum,” etc.), have another crew put it into place, a third use it, and a fourth analyze the effects.

    The number of peopel who have been in some way involved in part of the “UFO conspiracy” is easily in the 1000s. It could easily (and nautrally, quite bureaucratically) compartmentalized so that new more than 10-20 people are involved in any one part of it.

    More practically, the timeline of secrecy works out. I suggested that flying saucers were active for about 12 years and lights in the sky for about 20. By contrast, the F-117 (which is far more complicated) was secret for eight years. If it exists, Aurora [3] has been out for around 20 years.

    Seerov,

    Say the Soviets did structural analysis of some part of the US infrastructure they wished to take down, like military R&D. They may conclude that they could cripple our efforst through the targeted assassination of, say, 300 individuals, none of which would be high-profile. Each murder would be shocking to the family. None would be particularly interesting to anyone else.

    So could someone kill 300 Americans and get away with it? Murder’s not a federal crime, after all. How long would it take for folks in the region or nation to realize something’s odd going on?

    You can’t kill people to test out law-enforcement C4ISR. Considering the stakes, I can see killing cows.

    [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_51
    [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawk
    [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(aircraft)

  4. Dan tdaxp,

    that’s an interesting take on it. As I stated when we first started discussing this, I believe the point is to study the underground network building and information dissemination process by who you would call “inessential personnel” (IP).

    The government wants to watch these people–who are experiencing a similar phenomenon–process this information and contact others who are experiencing the same thing.

    Where I disagree is about the Soviet part. Instead, I think the government is more interested in studying information that IP’s are gathering/disseminating on the government itself, not any outside power.

    If the Soviets killed the people you described, this would be obvious to the government and something they would want to get out to the public in a hurry. Instead, the government is interested in how information flows when the system doesn’t assist them, or even as the system tries to suppress such information.

    Take an issue like black on white rape. The rate of black on white rape is something like 99:1. This is information the system doesn’t want to see get around. This would fire up Right Wing whites and potentially cause racial animosity in the country.

    There’s been some evidence of government ran internment camps in the US. One would think the so called “liberal media” would have reporters camped out at these places. The government probably built these places to house citizens during an emergency, but these camps could be used by people for anti-government political purposes.

    The government wants to know how to discredit people who spread “inconvenient information.”

    Besides suppressing such information the government also wants to know how to control it. I may be wrong but I personally believe that Alex Jones of “Prison Planet” is a government agent. The government wants to know how to influence these underground information dissemination processes. So again, they use Jones to study what kind of people take part in that subculture and the geography these people operate in. Every person who visits Jones’s websites probably gets their IP address recorded.

    Its no mistake that the cattle mutations took place in rural areas. Traditionally rural whites tend to be the most anti-government. If there would ever be an attempt to challenge the government’s power, it would be by rural whites. The government wants to study how these groups would form and what kinds of people join them. Before the Internet “ham radio” was important.

  5. The Ultra secret was kept by over 20,000 people after WW2. Large amounts of British official information from the Second World War alone hasn’t been deactivated and published yet, nor leaked. The Tuskegee Experiment in America went unreported for over 40 years.

    Its not like the job would necessarily involve the use of the word ‘UFO’. After all, working on one top secret aerospace project is much like another and there is no reason for various folks not to have only fleeting contact, to believe the project mothballed (like so many) or just fail to connect the dots between their work and what are frequently the theories of cranks.

    Pardon me but I rather thought Rendelsham, rather like MAJIC-12, had been debunked? Has new evidence emerged?

  6. Guy,

    Thanks for noting the 29 year secrecy of ULTRA [1]!

    The Paracase had a very high quality, two-hour interview with one of the principles of Rendelsham which I recommend. [2] Except for things that emerged through hypnosis, it fits the theory above. Interestingly, even his criticism of the colonel [3]

    “Over the years you have dropped certain hints about it being a military project and never anything about it being an Extraterrestrial event. Were you picked to be the scape goat on this to say it was of ET origin if anybody got to close to what it was? How can a chain of command all say they had nothing to do with the incident handle the incident the way they said they did at a front line NATO base – and still be left in charge?”

    Makes sense, as what he sees as a disinfo cover may well be the truth.

    [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra#Postwar_disclosures
    [2] http://www.theparacast.com/podcast/now-playing-june-21-2009-john-burroughs-and-peter-robbins/
    [3] http://www.theparacast.com/forum/press-release-col-charles-halt-t4733p2.html

  7. Confirmation?

    The Sun tabloid pointed to a video of a U.S. Navy F/A-18 tailing a strange-looking object. “UFO watchers reckon it could be proof of a government cover-up,” the paper declared.

    Jeebus, people, it’s the Boeing X-45 killer drone. See?

    http://warisboring.com/?p=2593

    Look at the last picture in the blog entry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>