<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KMT Soldiers Defect to the People&#8217;s Republic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2010/01/06/kmt-soldiers-defect-to-the-peoples-republic.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2010/01/06/kmt-soldiers-defect-to-the-peoples-republic.html</link>
	<description>High-minded, fanatically malthusian perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2010/01/06/kmt-soldiers-defect-to-the-peoples-republic.html/comment-page-1#comment-337218</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=8180#comment-337218</guid>
		<description>Great review. I&#039;d say it misses the ball on only two occasions. First is Stilwell&#039;s handling of his troops. He pushed the Marauders further than they should ever have been pushed,effectively destroying them as a unit. Second is the appointment of Stilwell, an Anglophobe, to a theatre of war where the British were the second most important player. 

Thinking in management terms, have you read Stephen Bungay&#039;s two history books? Bungay uses the modern management techniques as a prism to look at WW2. Absolutely sublime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. I&#8217;d say it misses the ball on only two occasions. First is Stilwell&#8217;s handling of his troops. He pushed the Marauders further than they should ever have been pushed,effectively destroying them as a unit. Second is the appointment of Stilwell, an Anglophobe, to a theatre of war where the British were the second most important player. </p>
<p>Thinking in management terms, have you read Stephen Bungay&#8217;s two history books? Bungay uses the modern management techniques as a prism to look at WW2. Absolutely sublime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdaxp</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2010/01/06/kmt-soldiers-defect-to-the-peoples-republic.html/comment-page-1#comment-337164</link>
		<dc:creator>tdaxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=8180#comment-337164</guid>
		<description>Silicon Hutong has a fascinating review of the Stilwell v. Chenault debate, interpreted through the lense of modern management of Sino-American joint ventures. [1]

[1] http://siliconhutong.typepad.com/silicon_hutong/2010/01/history-friday-a-clash-of-eagles-stilwell-vs-chennault.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silicon Hutong has a fascinating review of the Stilwell v. Chenault debate, interpreted through the lense of modern management of Sino-American joint ventures. [1]</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://siliconhutong.typepad.com/silicon_hutong/2010/01/history-friday-a-clash-of-eagles-stilwell-vs-chennault.html" rel="nofollow">http://siliconhutong.typepad.com/silicon_hutong/2010/01/history-friday-a-clash-of-eagles-stilwell-vs-chennault.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.tdaxp.com/archive/2010/01/06/kmt-soldiers-defect-to-the-peoples-republic.html/comment-page-1#comment-337065</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tdaxp.com/?p=8180#comment-337065</guid>
		<description>CBI wasn&#039;t all disastrous. Certainly it didn&#039;t go well for the KMT but the US got its shiny airbases and the British Empire&#039;s Burmese victories in 1944-45 were the biggest single defeat of the Japanese Army in the war. Considering how important China was to Roosevelt I&#039;m always surprised it gets so little attention in US history...

...Then again when your commander is an unlovable lunatic and most of your troops are poor, black and half-mutinous it probably doesn&#039;t fit well into the &#039;Great Crusade&#039; model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBI wasn&#8217;t all disastrous. Certainly it didn&#8217;t go well for the KMT but the US got its shiny airbases and the British Empire&#8217;s Burmese victories in 1944-45 were the biggest single defeat of the Japanese Army in the war. Considering how important China was to Roosevelt I&#8217;m always surprised it gets so little attention in US history&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;Then again when your commander is an unlovable lunatic and most of your troops are poor, black and half-mutinous it probably doesn&#8217;t fit well into the &#8216;Great Crusade&#8217; model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

