One can classify Americans as belonging to one of several economic classes, including the
- Grand Bourgeoisie, who are able to live off their investments
- The Petite Bourgeoisie, who have invested wealth but must work to maintain their life style
- The Proletariat, who have no invested wealth, and must work to live
- The Lumpenproletariat, criminals and rascals who are of no economic value.
Competition exists both between and within these classes.
Between-class and within-class competition exists to establish the terms of trade of these classes within society.
While everyday politics can do little to change the terms of trade between classes, it can greatly effect the terms-of-trade within classes.
For instance, the Petite Bourgeoisie in the United States is heavily white, but south asians and east asians are disproportionately represented within it. Nonetheless, all asians combined are still a small minority of the Petite, so the Petite BourgeoisieÂ spends most of its efforts on economically pointless cultural conflict (gar marriage, and so on).
The Proletariat, is much more diverse. Both blacks and hispanics are disproportionately represented in the proletariat. Further, unlike the petite bourgeoisie (where whites are a long-running and stable majority), immigration patterns created by the federal government (“the executive committee of the bourgeoisie” have lead to blacks being displaced as the largest minority in general, and even the largest non-white constituent group of the proletariat, by hispanics.
Whites in America really have no idea how hard life can be for blacks. Whites, whose leadership springs firmly from the petite bourgeoisie, are basically secure in their positions. In order to understand the plight of their fellow citizens, it is perhaps wise to imagine a United States in which Asians were already the dominant ethnic group.
The art of deciding who gets what is called politics. While political cartels can form among nearly all players in well established political communities, the immense tide of hispanic immigration in recent years means that it is impossible for factions within the proletariat to form a cartel without hispanic hegemony within that class. In the absence of a well established political community, the tools that will be used are democracy and organized violence. Democracy is a useful tool of the popular and numerous. Organized violence is the useful tool of the weak and small.
The lynching of George Zimmerman — the hispanic involved in a fatal confrontation with Treyvon Martin — only makes sense in the context of intraclass struggle. Organized violence — such as the eldery man beaten by 6 youths, the police car attacked, the death threats against the Zimmerman household etc — are clearly part of a LIHOP run by Al Sharpton on others to use the only means left at their disposal to save what remains of their hegemony within the proletariat.
People are murdered every day in the United States. Nothing’s special about that. No one cares.
What is unusual is for anyone to care.
And people do care in the case of Mr. Zimmerman.
Because lynching a hispanic is way cheaper for the petite bourgeoisie than facing a campaign of organized violence.
White petite bourgeoisie were getting hurt. Lynch a hispanic proletarian, and it all goes away.
A good deal, no?