With The Handbook of 5GW at the publisher, and the beginning of the Afghanistan 2050 Roundtable looming, what better time to share this document that Curtis Gale Weeks put together on the intellectual history of 5GW/xGW theory:
I don’t mind that Elena Kagan is a lesbian. I do mind that Elena Kagan wants toÂ criminalizeÂ criticism of her lifestyle:
â€œWe should be looking for new approaches, devising new arguments,â€ Kagan declared, according to video of the event reviewed by POLITICO. She seemed to count herself among â€œthose of us who favor some form of pornography and hate speech regulationâ€ and told participants that â€œa great deal can be done very usefullyâ€ to crack down on such evils.
â€œStatutes may be crafted in ways that prohibit the worst of hate speech and pornography, language that goes to sexual violence. Such statutes may still be constitutional,â€ Kagan assured the meeting. She pressed for â€œnew and harsher penalties against the kinds of violence against women that takes place in producing pornography, the use of pandering statutes and pimp statutes against pornographersâ€¦perhaps the initiationâ€”the enactment of new statutes prohibiting the hiring of women for commercial purposes to engage in sexual activities.â€
My view of freedom is much closer to that described in a recent post of The Metropolis Times:
At my local college campus, we have a man who visits and tells students that wearing the color pink will send them to Hell, and that God hates homosexuals, Catholics, Mormons, liberal Christians, Buddhists, sororities and fraternities and a large number of other things.Â Invariably, a group of students will spontaneously form and argue with him.
This is the only country in the entire world where none of the people involved are breaking the law.
…. unless Elena Kagan gets her way.
An upcoming blog roundtable will feature retrospective posts, and subsequent reactions, to Afghanistan in 2050. The distance between 2050 and now is 40 years, and as Lexington Green writes…
40 years is the period from Fort Sumter to the Death of Victoria, from the Death of Victoria to Pearl Harbor, from Pearl Harbor to the inauguration of Ronald Reagan. It is a big chunk of history. It is enough time to gain perspective.
This exercise in informed and educated imagination is meant to help us gain intellectual distance from the drumbeat of day to day events, to understand the current situation in Afghanistan more clearly, to think-through the potential outcomes, and to consider the stakes which are in play in the longer run of history for America, for its military, for the region, and for the rest of the world.
I am excited to be a part of this upcoming roundtable, along with Mark Safranski, Shane Deichman, and others. I hope my own upcoming post, The Long Type of Time, will be considered a worthwhile contribution.
Catholicgauze has an interesting post up, titled “China versus the United States in popularity.” One factor that goes unsaid is that because of China’s economic policies, it is rapidly leaving behind the developed world that once championed it. While much is going on behind the scenes, this shot from a Thai newspaper shows something of what the developing world is saying about its largest member
Whether or not “the globe is waking up to the arrogance of Chinese power,” other developing countries are no longer happy with China’s policy of manipulating its currency so as to undercut its competition.
This matches my experiences:
Executive summary in case you donâ€™t feel like reading the rest of this article: They like it. A lot. Ninety-eight percent say theyâ€™re satisfied with their iPads overall; ninety-six percent think itâ€™s a good value. In category after categoryâ€“3G service, most of the individual bundled apps, battery life, speed, the absence of Flashâ€“a majority of respondents are pleased.
As does this:
Interestingly, Nielsen’s results appear to show that reading on the iPad is significantly faster compared to the Kindle 2. But Nielsen was quick to dismiss this conclusion arguing that the reading speeds between the two devices were “not statistically significant.” “The difference [between reading times on the iPad and Kindle 2] would be so small that it wouldn’t be a reason to buy one over the other,” Nielsen wrote.
The study also asked each user to rate how they liked each format on a scale of 1 to 7. The iPad, Kindle 2, and printed book were nearly tied at 5.8, 5.7, and 5.6 respectively, while the PC monitor ranked last at 3.6 points. The test subjects said that reading on the PC felt too much like being at work, while they found it more relaxing to read a printed book than on an electronic device.
While Obama has done nothing to prevent the greatest oil disaster in world history…
… his record on broader science projects is, fortunately, more fixed
- Obama awards $2 billion for solar power
- Obama doubles wireless spectrum
- US Department of Energy Wants Bigger Wind Farms
… and clean up the BP spill, of course.