Tag Archives: identity politics

Reid caved, America suffers

Last month, I was temporarily impressed with Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid, when he vowed to use the Senate’s power to hold up the confirmation of Roland Burris, appointed by former Governor Blagoevich. But Reid, as those who thought less of Reid than I did expected, caved to identity politics and made Burris the junior Senator from Illinoise. Burris’s vote became critical for the Obama stimulus. And now, everyone is regretting it:

Sen. Roland Burris (D-Ill.) must go. – washingtonpost.com
From the moment that Mr. Burris was selected, he strove to portray himself as a blameless public servant. The sad pictures of Mr. Burris being cast out into the rain by the Democratic leadership of the Senate, which initially refused to seat him, turned public opinion in his favor. Mr. Burris got his seat. But this latest revelation makes a mockery of his professions of no quid pro quo. It is a violation of the public trust. The people of Illinois have suffered enough. Mr. Burris should resign.

If Reid had kept his word, Burris would not be a Senator, Illinois would not be embarrassed again, and the Obama Stimulus would not have passed in its current form.

As I said, Tammy Duckworth would have been a better choice.

Good girl

Sarah Palin is good looking.

Because she is inexperienced, she will be an “establishment candidate” like Barack Obama.

The McCain is turn fairing compliments and criticisms into identify politics “gaffes,” relying on the fact that Sarah Palin is a woman to generate criticism of those who criticize her.

In other words, McCain has taken a page from Obama’s playbook.

Like the pick of Palin itself, this ad only makes sense in the context of successful modeling of this approach by the Democratic Party.

Rosa Parks Way

While driving to a picnic on Saturday, I was disoriented to discover that a portion of “Capitol Parkway” had been renamed Rosa Parks Way. I was first struck by the criminal nature of this pun, and then secondly struck by how it seems typical of how misguided much of black community politics is.

Much self-consciously “black” politics seems to focus on either the deification of early leaders or rent seeking. Strivers such as Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Thurgood Marshall, and Jessee Jackson are celebrated, in a move that both marginalizes non-Southern black political cliques and obscures the actual nature of their opponents. The other purpose of the movement appears to be the political diversion of funds from other parts of the conomy. Companies are Coca-Cola are urged to spend resources on the victorious southern black clique, while “affirmative action” programs broaden the clique’s powerbase in an iron triangle of patronage.

Latino politics, in contrast, seems focused on a different goal: increasing the number of latinos. This has been quite effective. Rising from negligible status, latinos have risen to be the largest “minority” group in the country. At their current rate of growth, it’s likely that in the future “Latinos” will be all places and no places in the same way that, say, “German-Americans” are.

America may be tuned for a large supply of low-wage labor, but the fact is that labor is not coming from the Afro-Carribena or even Africa. The largest quantity of new immigrants are coming from Mexico and the rest of Latin America.

In part because of their different political strategies, the “black community” has consumed greater resources than would otherwise be the case but have made little systematic headway over the past generation. Latinos, by contrast, are becoming every more powerful.

Because they have avoided the “Rosa Parks Way” of doing politics.